Skip to main content
Log in

Isozyme and RAPD markers in relation to in vitro morphogenesis and in vivo development ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, popularly known as “mung bean,” is an important protein supplement in vegetarian diets in many countries of Asia. It has a short life cycle (55–70 days) and fits well into many cropping systems, including rice and sugarcane, under rain-fed and irrigated conditions. The present review deals with the data available on plant regeneration of this species. Both shoot-tip multiplication and somatic embryogenesis have been compared on the basis of retrospective as well as recent reports. Molecular markers, especially random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), have been used to compare results obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies on various species ofVigna. Isozyme markers such as esterase and superoxide dismutase, which are expressed during in vitro regeneration and in vivo development ofVigna species, are also included in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ahuja, B. S., T. A. Sharma Ushakiran &Sundershan. 1980. Activities of Superoxide dismutase & peroxidase enzymes during early phase of germination in mung bean (Phaseolus aureus). Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 17: 77–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, Y. P. S. &M. S. Dhanju. 1979. Regeneration of plants from apical meristem tips of some legumes. Curr. Sci. 48: 906–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &H. Singh. 1980.In vitro induction of androgenesis in mung bean (Phaseolus aureus L.). Indian J. Exp. Biol. 18: 1316–1318.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. &J. G. Scandalios. 1981. Isolation and characterization of the cytosolic and mitochondrial Superoxide dismutases of maize. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 206: 249–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,J. M. Chandlee &J. G. Scandalios. 1983. Purification and partial characterization of a genetically-defined Superoxide dismutase (SOD-1) associated with maize chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 73: 31–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C. O. &I. Fridovich. 1973. Isozymes of Superoxide dismutase from wheat germ. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 317: 50–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Betal, S. 2003. In vitro plant regeneration and molecular biological studies ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Ph.D. diss., Calcutta University.

  • — &S. Sen Raychaudhuri. 1999. Micropropagation of the endangered aromatic varieties ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek in West Bengal, India. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant 35: 76–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2001. Shoot tip multiplication in aromatic and non-aromatic varieties ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Plant Tissue Cult. 11(2): 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bora, K. K., R. Ganesh & S. R. Mathus. 1999. Effect of triazole on the activities of enzymes of activated oxygen metabolism and lipid peroxidation in senescing mungbean leaves. Abstr. 5773, XVI Intl. Bot. Congr., Saint Louis, MO.

  • Boutin, S. R., N. D. Young, T. C. Olson, Z. H. Yu, R. C. Shoemaker &C. E. Vallejos. 1995. Genome conservation among three legume genera detected with DNA markers. Genome 38: 928–937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S. 1987. Cytological and biochemical aspects of cultured tissues during growth and regeneration and effect of mutagens on cabbage underin vitro. Ph.D. diss., Calcutta Univ.

  • Chandra, M. &A. Pal. 1995. Differential response of the two cotyledons ofVigna radiata in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 248–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S. 1988. Problems and prospects of mungbean improvement in India. Pp. 588–595in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Cheng, T. Y., H. Saka &T. H. Voqui-Dinh. 1980. Plant regeneration from soybean cotyledonary node segments in culture. Plant Sc. Lett. 19: 91–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cubadda, R. &E. Quattrucci. 1974. Separation by gel electrofocussing and characterization of wheat esterses. J. Sci. Food Agric. 25: 417–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eapen, S. 1988. Callus induction from mesophyll and hypocotyl protoplasts of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.)). Ann. Bot. 62: 441–443.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fatokun, C. A., D. I. Danesh, D. Menancio-Hautea &N. D. Young. 1992. A linkage map of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] based on DNA markers (2N = 22). Pp. 6.256–6.258in S. J. O’Brien (ed.), Genome maps. Ed. 6. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, G. C. J. & S. Shanmugasundaram. 1988. The AVRDC Mungbean Improvement Program: The past present and future. Pp. 58–70in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Franklin, C. I., T. N. Trieu, R. A. Gonzales &R. A. Dixon. 1991. Plant regeneration from seedling expiants of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 24: 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridovich, I. 1975. Superoxide dismutases. Annual Rev. Biochem. 44: 147–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. The biology of oxygen radicals. Science 201: 875–880.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg, O. L., R. A. Miller &K. Ojima. 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girija, S. &A. Ganapathi. 1996. Somatic embryogenesis in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). In Vitro 32(2): 86A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, A. &P. K. Jaiwal. 1990. Culture conditions affecting plant regeneration from cotyledon of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 23: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1992.In vitro induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from shoot tips of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 29: 199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1994. Plant regeneration from cotyledonary node expiants of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Plant Cell Rep. 13: 523–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C., J. Dench, A. L. Moore, B. Halliwell, C. H. Foyer &D. O. Hall. 1978. Subcellular localization and identification of Superoxide dismutase in the leaves of higher plants. Eur. J. Biochem. 91: 339–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. A. &S. L. A. Hobbs. 1990. Rapid multiple shoot production from cotyledonary node explants pf pea (Pisum sativum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant 26: 835–838.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, H. K. &K. L. Mehra. 1980. Evolution, adaptation, relationships and uses of the species ofVigna cultivated in Asia. Pp. 459–468in R. J. Summerfield & A. H. Bunting (eds.), Advances in legume science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V. &D. R. Sharma. 1989. Isolation and characterization of sodium chloride resistant callus culture ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek var. radiata. J. Exp. Bot. 40(210): 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrides, C. J., R. J. Lawn, I. D. Godwin, J. Manners &B. C. Imrie. 2000. Two genetic linkage maps of mungbean using RFLP and RAPD markers. Australian J. Agric. Res. 51: 415–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, P. G. 1996. Estimation of heterozygosity inRibes nigrum L. using RAPD markers. Genetica 98: 193–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, J. R., R. Sanve &N. Gawel. 1997. Identification of poinsettia cultivars using RAPD markers. Hort. Sci. 32(1): 122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M. A., H. D. Coletta, M. L. P. N. Targon &J. Pompeu. 1996. Genetic relationship of Mediterranean mandarins (Citrus deliciosa Terore) using RAPD markers. Euphytica 92: 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, C. P. &M. B. Singh. 1994. Plant enzymology and histo-enzymology—A text manual. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, C. A., M. E. Loureiro, M. A. Oliva &M. Maestri. 2001. Differential responses of Superoxide dismutase in freezing resistantSolanum curtilobum and freezing sensitiveSolanum tuberosum subjected to oxidative and water stress. Plant Sci. 160: 505–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, H. 1987. Morphogenetic responses forin vitro cultured seedling expiants of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 11: 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, P. &K. F. Grafton. 1989. Regeneration of dry bean (Phaselus vulgaris L.) via organogenesis. Plant Sci. 60: 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. M. &I. Fridovich. 1969. Superoxide dismutase: An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (Hemocuprein). J. Biol. Chem. 244: 6049–6055.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,B. B. Keele &I. Fridovich. 1971. An enzyme based theory of obligate anaerobiosis: The physiological function of Superoxide dismutase. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 68: 1024–1027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menancio-Hautea, D., L. Kumar, D. Danesh &N. D. Young. 1992. A genome map for mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] based on DNA genetic markers (2N = 2X = 22). Pp. 6.259–6.261in S. J. O’Brien (ed.), Genome maps. Ed. 6. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,C. A. Fatokun, L. Kumar, D. Danesh &N. D. Young. 1993. Comparative genome analysis of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) and cowpea (V. unguiculata L. Walpers) using RFLP mapping data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86(7): 797–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, A. B., K. Hattori, T. Nishimura &Y. Futsuhara. 1993. Histological and scanning electron microscopic observations on plant regeneration in mungbean cotyledon (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) culturedin vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 32: 137–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroginski, L. A. &K. K. Kartha. 1984. Tissue culture of legumes for crop improvement. Pp. 215–264in J. Janick (ed.), Plant breeding reviews. AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, K. B., S. Faloona, R. Saiki, G. Horn &H. Erlich. 1986. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNAin vitro: The polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 51: 263–273.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. &F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, M., U. Ghosh, M. Chandra, A. Pal &B. B. Biswas. 1991. Transformation and regeneration of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 28: 449–455.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paroda, R. S. & T. A. Thomas. 1988. Genetic resources of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) in India. Pp. 19–28in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Pasquet, R. S. 1999. Genetic relationships among subspecies ofVigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. based on allozyme variation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1104–1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, M. B., R. Bhardwaj &A. Joshi. 1991. Organogenesis inVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 29: 619–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl-Treves, R. &E. Galun. 1991. The tomato Cu, Zn Superoxide dismutase genes are developmentally regulated and respond to light stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik, S., S. Chakraborty &S. Sen Raychaudhuri. 1994. Nuclear DNA content and chromosomal variation in relation to callus growth duringin vitro regeneration inPlantago ovata. Cytobios 80: 101–108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,S. Sen Raychaudhuri &S. Chakraborty. 1996. Changes in isozymes duringin vitro morphogenesis inPlantago ovata Forsk. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 44: 123–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathachari, P., V. K. Khanna, U. S. Singh &N. K. Singh. 2000. RAPD analysis of genetic variability in Indian scented rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.). Curr. Sci. 79 (7): 994–998.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. D. &B. Venkaiah. 1984. Studies on Superoxide dismutase from mungbean (Vigna radiata) seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 116: 279–284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, T. S., K. Singh &B. Singh. 1988. Mungbean germplasm resources: Evaluation and utilization. Pp. 29–34in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Sawada, Y., T. Ohyama &I. Yamazaki. 1972. Preparation and physicochemical properties of green pea Superoxide dismutase. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 268: 305–312.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selva, E., B. Stouffs &M. Briquet. 1989. In vitro propagation ofVicia faba L. by micro-cutting and multiple shoot induction. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 18(2): 167–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvi, D. T., N. M. Ramaswamy, S. Sukumar &S. R. Sree Rangaswamy. 1995.In vitro regeneration and protoplast culture studies in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). In Vitro 31(2): 62A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. P. 1988. Current status of mungbean yellow mosaic virus resistance breeding. Pp. 282–289in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Singh, G., S. Kapoor & K. Singh. 1988. Multiple disease resistance in mungbean with special emphasis on mungbean yellow mosaic virus. Pp. 290–296in Mungbean: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987.

  • Sonnante, G., A. R. Piergiovanni, N. Q. Ng &P. Perrino. 1996. Relationships ofVigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.,V. vexillata (L.) A. Rich and species of sectionVigna based on isozyme variation. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution 43: 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,A. Spinosa, A. Marangi &D. Pignone. 1997. Isozyme and RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity within and betweenVigna luteola andVigna marina. Ann. Bot. 80: 741–746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J., J. Bacher &K. Poetter. 1996. Sources of potential errors in the application of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber. Hort. Sci. 31(2): 262–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • VCGC (Vigna Crop Germplasm Committee). 1996.Vigna germplasm current status and future needs: A report prepared by theVigna Crop Germplasm Committee, March 1996.

  • Wilde, L. G. &M. Yu. 1998. Effect of fluoride on Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in germinating mungbean seedlings. Fluoride 31(2): 81–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. G. K., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski &S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. S., S. M. Koehler, M. G. Carner, M. H. Williams, M. A. Hinchee, S. M. Colburn, G. C. Devis &P. E. Pierson. 1986. Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of soybean by organogenesis. Pp. 3: 111–119 in I. K. Vasil (ed.), Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants: Plant regeneration and genetic variability. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. &A. T. Bakalinsky. 1996. Identification of grape (Vitis) rootstock using sequence characterized amplified region DNA markers. Hort. Sci. 31(2): 267–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, N. D., D. Danesh, D. Menancio-Hautea &L. Kumar. 1993. Mapping oligogenic resistance to powdery mildew in mungbean with RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 243–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betal, S., Raychaudhuri, S.S. Isozyme and RAPD markers in relation to in vitro morphogenesis and in vivo development ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Bot. Rev 69, 441–456 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)069[0441:IARMIR]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)069[0441:IARMIR]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation